Between Us and Sustainable Energy

 A friend of mine, way back in sixth grade, asked me, “Why don’t we just use solar power for

everything? It’s available everywhere if you think about it.” And that really did get me thinking,

why do we not use clean energy for everything. So, like any good future humanities student, to

answer my question I started reading about clean energy, this led me to find out that the

solution is not that simple. Today, almost six years after my friend's ingenious yet impractical

suggestion, the use of clean energy is something I am passionate about.

To implement any solution, first, we have to recognise the hurdles that stand in its way, and

these are some, I believe, that stand in the way of clean energy being used on a global

scale.

I believe that the problem of not using sustainable fuels continues because of its expensive

nature and the convenience of fossil fuels. To counteract this, governments ought to increase

their spending on research for clean energy.

Another reason is that we simply haven't found a perfect clean fuel. Many sectors, like the

transport sector, need fossil fuels because of their high energy density. Petrol contains about 40

times more energy than the most advanced battery (when both are of equal weight).

Certain industrial processes, like the manufacturing of glass, steel, cement, etc., need extremely

high temperatures, which are extremely difficult and impractical to achieve without the use of

fossil fuels.

The top 100 companies produce about 71% of global emissions, so the profit-driven nature of

companies that use fossil fuels to cut costs is also a factor. Most stakeholders in oil and fossil

fuel companies are extremely influential, and this affects the policy decisions of governments

that are swayed by these tycoons.

Finally, there is the fact that for many people, on a personal level, clean energy is not a burning

priority (pun intended). About 771 million people live in extreme poverty. For them, putting food

on the table is much more important than assessing what fuel they use.

The lack of technological advancement in using clean energy in developing countries, combined

with the tendency of companies to set up fossil fuel-consuming industries in said countries,

forms a huge hurdle for making clean energy mainstream.

Does this mean that the dream of clean energy is hopeless? I, being the ever-optimistic person, say no. It is definitely not completely impossible for us to make the green change. I will follow up on this in a new blog!

Democracy Is The Best Form Of Government [For] - Debate Topic for Students

 

Why Democracy Is The Best Form Of Government

"Democracy is the destiny of humanity; freedom its indestructible arm."

-Benito Juarez

I am of the firm belief that democracy is the best form of government available to us right now. Why? Let's start with the basics.

Firstly, democracy allows us to exercise various freedoms, such as freedom of speech and expression, and the freedom to criticise one's own government. Democracy is the government of the people, this is perhaps its biggest and most widely known virtue. Allowing everyone to participate in the decision-making process, at least in theory.

Democracies tend to produce stronger systems of checks and balances, independent media, and rule of law than other governance systems. And these institutions yield the consistently positive results seen in democracies.

Mulligan, Gil, and Sala-i-Martin (2004) find that countries that are more democratic are less likely to execute, regulate religion, or censor the press.

Gallego (2010) presents evidence that democracy has indeed had a causal effect on primary-school enrollment.

 Baum and Lake (2001) find that democratization increased secondary-school enrollment. Also, Acemoglu, Naidu, Restrepo, and Robinson (2015) find that democracy is associated with an increase in secondary schooling.

Few autocratic countries enjoy child mortality rates under 10 per 1,000. In contrast, democracies often enjoy child mortality rates below 10 or even 5 per 1,000.

Here we have considered only child mortality, but a broader analysis of countries’ health outcomes would also show that more generally, good health is linked with political freedom. My source is the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation.

A review of the economic growth performances of all developing countries since 1960 finds democracies have, on average, attained rates of per capita GDP growth equivalent to their autocratic counterparts. This holds for each decade as well as in aggregate. There is no empirical evidence of an authoritarian growth advantage.

On nearly every social welfare measure available, democracies exhibit development outcomes that are 15-40% superior to that of autocracies, controlling for income.

Democratic countries tend to be wealthier and have a better distribution of wealth throughout the population.

Everything considered what truly helps democracy be the best form of government is the satisfaction of the people with it.

Over the twenty-eight countries examined happiness levels in democracies stayed robust, even when variables like religion, language, and of course, income, were controlled (Dorn, Fischer, et. al 2007). Incidentally, these particular findings are also supported by (Frey and Stutzer 2000), that household income to have a minimal effect on happiness, in contrast to the effect of direct democracy. 

Winston Churchill once said, "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." And I have to agree, democracy has many flaws and problems but it is still the best form of government compared to all others that have been tried over and over again.